MINUTES OF MEETING
MIDDLE VILLAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Middle Village Community Development District was held on Monday, March 8, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. at the Plantation Oaks Amenity Center, 845 Oakleaf Plantation Parkway, Orange Park, Florida 32065.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

Rocky Morris Michael Steiner Rod Swartz Mike ReynoIds Tim Hartigan
Also present were: Jim Perry
Mike Eckert
Jay Soriano Chalon Suchsland Marilee Giles

FffiST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Chairman  Vice Chairman Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor

District Manager District Counsel Operations Manager VerdeGo Landscape GMS

Call to Order

Mr. Perry called the meeting to order and called the roll.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Audience Comments
There being no conunents, the next item followed.

THffiD  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Consent Agenda
Approval of the Minutes of the February 8, 2021 Meeting
Financial Statements
Assessment Receipt Schedule
Check Register
Mr. Perry stated included are the minutes of the last meeting, financial statements as of January 3 Ist, your assessment receipts schedule showing you are 95% collected and the check register totaling $138,247.95.

On MOTION by Mr. Morris seconded by Mr. Hartigan with all in favor the consent agenda was approved.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Ratification of E-Verify Memorandum of
Understanding
Mr. Perry stated this memorandum has already been filed and is in regard to E-Verify and the Department of Homeland Security. We're filing this for all of our districts, and it is a requirement.
Mr. Steiner stated I don't see any of the board members involved directly.
Mr. Perry stated no, you are not.
Mr. Steiner asked we're having to do this because we have employees?
Mr. Perry responded we do have employees and we do contract out services so the contracts that we've let out are supposed to also comply with E-Verify so there are two components to it.
Mr. Steiner asked but there would not be a time where the Board would have to do
anything?
Mr. Perry responded no; staff will take care of it as part of the process of hiring new employees.

On MOTION by Mr. Morris seconded by Mr. Steiner with all in favor the E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding was ratified.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
District Counsel

Staff Reports

There being nothing to report, the next item followed.

District Engineer
There being nothing to report, the next item followed.

District Manager
There being nothing to report, the next item followed.

Operations Manager - Memorandum
Mr. Soriano stated we have a couple of events coming up. Spring Break will start this next week. On that annual tentative event schedule that I gave you guys last month, I forgot one

item. Our food truck program that runs every other Friday, they do the second Friday over at your sister district and that is actually this Friday coming up. We are going to do a movie with that food truck event. Kids are out of school as of Friday and they are out the entire week. We are opening the pools for that time. We have an Easter fun run planned, and this is a virtual event kind of like our Thanksgiving fun run that we did so there is a map that we will send out for both districts and they have these Easter eggs they have to find and do selfies with them and send them to us. That will be a two-week long event and it ends that weekend after Easter. We have the vendor fair that is planned for April 3,d at your sister district. Here, we will be turning the heaters for the pools off after Spring Break. We will open up for Spring Break with full lifeguards and then we close back down where we're only open for weekends in April. We will be closed that first weekend just because of the Easter holiday. I also gave you the hours for the pools and there weren't really any changes. I did go over the budget and looked at the possibility of adding those nighttime hours on Fridays and Saturdays after the July 4th weekend and it's a total of five Fridays and five Saturdays. It will only add a few thousand dollars to our budget, and we are usually well under that. Your side would be a little higher because you do carry seven lifeguards compared to your sister district with five lifeguards, but that is not that great of an increase, so it is something we're going to do. I will put that operating schedule on the website this week.
Mr. Soriano continued. I wanted to update you on a couple of things on the repairs side. Our fencing worked out a little better than I had planned. We had some trouble trying to match the customized fencing, so we came up with another idea. The fencing is done if you get a chance to go out there, but I do not have gates. We have the material, but we're fabricating them ourselves instead of buying the outrageously expensive gates. This way, the fencing actually matches what was out there and it cost us about $2,000 instead of the $4,500 that I was planning on to buy the fancy gates. My concern is whether that fabrication will be done in time for Spring Break. It may be that we keep the other gates operational until after Spring Break. I have a request looking at the project that we have over at your sister district, which is a walking trail. There are some major roots after we've cleared out the trail. It's almost a three-quarter walkway  behind the large pond. It was suggested we cut the roots but that is a lot of work. There are some that I'm going to cut out because they are big and I can see them as a tripping hazard, but this is a natural area, so I was looking to mulch it, I just don't want to buy mulch every year. We have a lot of tree debris that we can use so I'm looking at a large chipper. This is not a chipper we would

buy for our backyards. It's also not some big commercial piece of equipment like what VerdeGo uses. They have a very large one that hooks up to a truck and you can throw logs in this thing. We do have our storage space now and we can get one of these smaller machines and if you notice back by our storage area, we have a lot of tree debris that this would be useful for also. Then I can use that mulch to cover up some of these walking areas. Even to get one of the smaller commercial options, I'm still looking at about $8,000. This would be something you would split with your sister district because we would be using it in both locations so I'm looking for $4,000 from you guys.
Mr. Hartigan asked has our sister district already committed to it?
Mr. Soriano responded they have.

On MOTION by Mr. Swartz seconded by Mr. Morris with all in favor of purchasing a woodchipper at an amount not to exceed
$4,000 to be paid by Middle Village CDD was approved.

Mr. Soriano stated we are pretty deep in projects, so we have about a week to get a lot of stuff done at the pools and then we open up for Spring Break and then I get to close down after that for a little bit to finish things up before summer really starts.
Mr. Swartz asked any updates on the security guards?
Mr. Soriano responded I have a couple of quotes, but I really only have one company that's been responsive. I told evefYbody I would give them a little more time, but I think by next month I will present you guys with the few quotes that I have. Even then, unless somebody comes out in the next couple of weeks, that company that I presented material for to you guys last month were great. They came out and actually walked through and took a couple of hours to go through both sites and see all of the operations. The couple of others that have responded have basically looked at our budget, looked at our hours and sent me their thoughts on that. I'm hoping I get more because I would like to give a few options.
Mr. Swartz asked is it our intention this year with the pools reopening to allow guests to
come back?
Mr. Soriano responded yes. Right now, there's really no limitations and we took away the capacity rules as far as how many people could be at the pools. We even cut down on closing evefY couple of hours so we got back to a normal and by then, no one was really worried about

guests because the kids were going back to school but now, we can utilize guests and we will get back to those rules that we had in place before the cutting down such as for weekend guests you use two passes to bring one guest and during the week it's one pass. All guest passes have been reloaded into our system so as of February 1" the 12 free passes are available. There are really no limits that I'm seeing at the pools.
Mr. Steiner asked when do we have our policy meeting again?
Mr. Perry responded we're going to provide policy changes to the Board next month.
Mr. Steiner stated I'd like to bring up something. We had some issues that were brought up over the last month having to do with dogs and at first, I thought what the folks had been told might not be correct, but in looking I found quickly that it was correct, and I have a problem with that. It strictly says no dogs on property. I know why the broad stroke was in there; it gave  a level of control, but I think we need to be a little bit more explicit in stating that dogs are allowed in certain areas. No dogs are allowed on the grand lawn, no dogs are allowed on the ball fields because we have kids playing out there, and we have weddings here. All dogs must be on leashes and all owners are required to pick up their waste. I think that would be more to what we're looking for. You might want a line in there about being disruptive; overly aggressive and that type of thing, but it does clarify the fact that there are some areas that they can go that even though it's District property, we allow dogs to be walked in those areas if it's done in a responsible manner. The other side of it is I don't know who said what to who, but somewhere along the way it was stipulated that the walkway belongs to the condos in the townhouses. They're talking about the promenade, and that belongs to us and therefore we can't even have dogs on that as it stands now. I think that needs to be done. I think in today's environment we have an awful lot of dog owners. We've seen that with the requests for dog parks. I think if responsible owners are allowed to use the area and do dispose of the waste, then I don't see a problem in it.
Mr. Hartigan stated I think we may have to go a little bit more in depth with that. I know you don't like signs, but realistically, we're going to need a larger sign that includes several of the rules that the conununity has no idea about or claims to have no idea about. If the owner doesn't pick up their dog waste, then Oakleaf has some sort of stance to say where is your access card so they have to comply with it, otherwise we have no way to take action against it. In terms

of the dog park, I don't know ifwe have the feasibility over here to even consider it, and that's something down the line.
Mr. Steiner stated we don't. It's been brought up and we don't have property for it.
Basically, people want to have a dog park and it really needs to go to the County. They have areas around they could utilize for that, or a developer, but as I understand it, the CDD has no property that can be considered to be used for a dog park. These open areas are owned by the County and developers.
Mr. Soriano stated we do have some areas that are not marked as preserve that we could use as common ground, but you're talking about clearing land and thousands of dollars just to get some grass. I don't know that we'd be able to do that. We can look at it, but I don't think it makes· a lot of sense. What we did over at your sister district was we were redoing one of our older playgrounds as something in our capital study. While we were redoing the playground, we changed the footprint of the park itself. It was a very spread-out park with swings on one side and a play structure on the other, so we moved them closer together and took the other portion  of the park, about two-thirds of an acre and made that into a small dog park.
Mr. Steiner stated I'm not advocating that we set up a dog park. I think ifwe at least get to where people can walk their dogs, use the promenade, and be respectful to the area.
Mr. Soriano stated let me clarify some of the biggest problems that are coming about the
last couple of months. It's not the dogs. Staff is not going out there and just telling people they can't have their dogs, that's not the problem. We've always had dogs  here and  we've always been lenient, however we have had that rule that it's in our policies that there are no pets on District property. It's more because of abuse of that. Then you have residents that come out here and they go off-leash, which it's actually a County code that you can't do that. Then you also have those people that don't clean up after their dogs, so we have mess everywhere. Our big problem, especially lately, is that ifl go to this gentleman and tell him you can't have your dog off leash and you're not even supposed to have your dog here, I have to go to everybody  else and tell them you're not supposed to have your dogs here because they say well how come you haven't talked to them. So, then we go to those good dog owners that are great about locking their dogs on their leash and picking up with their doggy bags and then they get upset.
Mr. Steiner stated that's why we as an entity need to stipulate so you're not saying you can't have your dog off leash because dogs aren't allowed. If we have a statement in there that

all dogs must be leashed, period, then you don't have to worry about the person whose dog is on a leash and doing what they're supposed to do.
Mr. Reynolds asked why are we saying no dogs?
Mr. Soriano stated it's a County code and that's always been in there. Mostly because people don't pick up after the dogs and we have issues. Last week I was working over at your sister district and I stepped in a pile of dog poop and this is in an area where four- and five-year­ olds play. We used to have signage out here saying things like keep your dog on a leash, however that's a County code. It doesn't even have to be in our policies. We can add more signs and specific rules, or I think the bigger concern is do we just take away the no dog rule. Does that open up the door more? I have to have enough staff to go out there and police it.
Mr. Reynolds stated it seems to me that we're playing two hands.
Mr. Soriano stated normally I would tell the staff not to be lenient It's still a rule. Staff is definitely not being rude to anybody. What I get is, they yelled at me and kicked me out and threatened me and I don't think that is the case, especially when I have witnesses there that tell me no, we saw this guy running off leash and come to find out that's why he's upset, because he doesn't want to follow the rule. That's a County  code and  doesn't have anything to do with us  so that's a little bit different, but ifwe want to adjust the rule to allow dogs, we can, and I don't' see a problem with it. I do think it's better if it's spelled out in which locations. I don't know if that's going to help. Even at your sister district the big problem is around the sports field.
Mr. Steiner stated I guess you spell out the areas like the grand lawn, the ball field, and  if anybody has a dog in that area whether it's off-leash or not, it stipulates that area can't have animals on it, mainly because we have kids on it.
Mr. Soriano stated right now we're having a problem with the gated area and it does
specifically say you can't have a dog in there like the softball fields and even the tennis courts. Most of it is the softball field on your side.
Mr. Steiner stated but we're using the rule that says no dogs on property, which gives me
the ability to say well why are you not asking him not to be on property and he's out here along the walkway.
Mr. Soriano stated we are doing that. We're going out and talking to everybody.
Mr. Swartz stated I think what Mike is saying is we need to be consistent. If we're going to say no dogs on property, then no dogs are allowed on property.

Mr. Soriano stated we can be consistent and say we're going to cut all dogs out period.
Mr. Steiner stated I think you'll have a full house if that occurs. I was surprised that we didn't have the people that were planning to come show up tonight.
Mr. Morris stated we're going to address this next month. So why don't we come up with some language that clarifies it. I think it is a bit ambiguous if we are saying no dogs allowed, but yet we're letting people with dogs walk the property. It is kind of confusing so I would suggest we look at this and put some type of parameters down as to where people can have dogs. At all times they have to be on a leash, but where is it that they can be, and all other places would be restricted.
Mr. Swartz stated and language that if you don't clean up after your dog, there should be
a clear penalty.
Mr. Reynolds asked and the waste receptacles?
Mr. Swartz responded let's not go there. There are trash cans all over the community and you can carry a bag.
Mr. Soriano stated short of your promenade, and I'd make an argument that you can't do
it there, there's really no area out here that you guys want to open up and say you can have dogs. The back area back there is a rentable space. A couple of years ago we said you could do that, not that anybody does. They really want Grand Lawn, and we spend thousands to keep that grass good for weddings, so you've got that. They can't be at the tennis courts. I walked in on somebody using the bathroom the other day and the dog was in there with them and we have spelled out that only service animals are allowed in the buildings. They can't be in the pools and they can't be in the basketball court. Your only space really is the promenade and the space surrounding those fields.
Mr. Swartz asked what about the playground?
Mr. Soriano responded we're required to spend extra money on special mulch and if you let people walk around in there and they're not picking up after their dogs where the kids play, I find that problematic. You're really limited if you want to say dogs are allowed because you don't have a lot of space here, but we can change that rule. Unless you want to include that area behind, but that's practice fields.
Mr. Steiner stated in the rules and policy it says no pets are allowed other than in those
areas specifically designated for such, but where is it designated for such?

Mr. Morris stated that's probably the key and we need to outline that.
Mr. Steiner stated I have no problem if you go ahead and stipulate that the Grand Lawn and however you want to classify the other lawn out there.
Mr. Soriano stated I think it would be easier to designate where they can go.
Mr. Swartz stated well then you better spell it out, paved areas, and outside the ball fields. Mr. Eckert stated I think I understand the point you're trying to make. Jay and I can work together before the next meeting to propose some language that may address it. I think it's just going to end up being a very limited area, but I agree, rather than try and carve everything out, which is probably 90% of it, let's just figure out if there is anywhere that is allowed and then if you identify two or three areas where you do want to allow it, I would just suggest you designate one area on a six-month trial basis and see if people are actually cleaning up after their dogs because if they're not, I don't know why you would want to open up the other two areas and take
it back away. Just something to think about.
Mr. Steiner stated I think we just need to stipulate something. I'm just concerned and I do understand why after a large number of years where animals have been allowed all through this area and periodically people get shut down because they're either off-leash and running in the ball fields out here that has the fences on it, or whatever, but I was rather concerned when someone said no animals are allowed on property and I was going back to correct them but then when I looked at the rules, the rule is there so I didn't make any statement at all but I think it needs to be looked at.
Mr. Morris stated yes, so let's table it and Mike and Jay can put their heads together.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Audience	Comments	I	Supervisors'
Requests
Mr. Anthony Egger, 1054 Maple Lane, stated Oakleaf Sports would like to practice at some of the facilities here in phase two. Last football season we had about five teams or so ages six to twelve and probably around 100 to 120 players with the majority of those being residents. We have spring football season starting soon and that's 11 on 11. There is some field space behind the softball fields that we would like to have the ability to practice on, but apparently, we're told we're not allowed to practice there or allowed to hold any meetings or anything like that, that says Oakleaf Sports. Is there a reason for that?

Mr, Soriano responded yes; we currently have a contract with Oakleaf Sports Association for usage. We're not looking to go in and take room away from one organization to give to another and they do have that area that is provided to them by contract.
Mr. Egger asked how long is that contract for? They have their own facilities, right? They have the baseball fields and the football fields, and I think you have a contract with I-9 as well for the soccer fields.
Mr. Soriano responded that is a different district, but yeah, we have contracts with OSA,
I-9 and Elite.
Mr. Egger asked are they renting from you right now? Mr. Soriano responded they all have a usage agreement. Mr. Egger stated so they use that 24/7?
Mr. Soriano responded they don't use it 24/7, but we're not going to take away space from them. We've heard if they're lower on registration it means they can give up more space. We don't get into trying to figure out where they can squeeze into and where we can put more. They've been with us for years and they've done a good job, so we've continued their usage agreement.
Mr. Egger asked so why aren't we allowed to hold just team meetings or something like
that. Why were we told if we do, the police are going to be called?
Mr. Soriano responded your meetings are a little different and it wasn't a threat like that. This was a little different with Mr. Antonio Heart if you remember him. This usage for the fields is for residents and their direct guests only. We do have a lot of people that will want to come out here and hold meetings or do things on property that bring others in that don't live here. I  can tell you your sports organization has a lot of people in Forest Hammock and they're not residents of this District. Not that the other sports don't, but we've given them rules by their usage agreement to have those people in there.  We don't do meetings  out here. There are a lot of groups in the area and if everybody wanted to use our property, we would have all kinds of meetings and gatherings and we would have no control over who is out there and if they are residents or not.
Mr. Egger stated they would have to ask for permission first.
Mr. Soriano stated that didn't happen before, however even then for sports we have stayed with our associations. If that were to change in the future that's one thing.

Mr. Egger asked is this an unending contract?
Mr. Soriano responded no; we're not making that statement. Mr. Egger asked so when does it expire?
Mr. Soriano responded there's really no expiration date. If you want to continue to work with me in my office you can talk to me every month, but right now we have no problem with OSA and we're not going to just stop that unless we have some concerns with OSA that I haven't heard of.
Mr. Egger stated I was just looking to share a little bit.
Mr. Soriano stated that was offered but it wasn't thought to be a good idea. Mr. Egger asked what do you mean?
Mr. Soriano responded it was offered to the director of Oakleaf Youth Sport to work with

OSA.

Mr. Egger asked so you'd be open to that?
Mr. Soriano responded I told him yes, but that is between you guys. I don't know who is

on your board, we were only dealing with him before, but that's between you guys and OSA. That's actually how I-9 got their usage agreement.
Mr. Egger asked so if Oakleaf Sports Association says no, it doesn't matter what the board says here, they're controlling it?
Mr. Soriano responded that's not at all what I said. We're not going to get involved in taking space away from them.
Mr. Egger asked so we can't share then if they say no.
Mr. Soriano responded you can share, but you need to work that out with them. We've given them right to the usage so if you can work with them then we're happy to change the usage agreement around but that has to come from them, we're not just going to take space away from them because they've done nothing wrong.
Mr. Egger asked so we have to go to them to see if we can share? I can't ask the Board here to vote on something?
Mr. Soriano responded I believe that's working together. You have to at least talk to
them.
Mr. Egger asked but if they say no?

Mr. Swartz responded if they say no, then that would be the right time to come here but you have not gone to them. Jay has said it four times so I'm just helping out. We've gone through this before as a Board. We have our associations handle that stuff because we don't want to get involved in day-to-day little scoffs, so you guys work things out with them and if things don't work out, then that's the proper time to come talk to us, but you're not following the chain of command here. You're trying to get us to do your dirty work.
Mr. Egger stated I'm just relaying information. I'm an Oakleaf  resident and I  was told we can't use the facilities and we can't meet here, and the police would be called ifwe they come out so I'm trying to understand the reason behind that and wanted to ask the Board what the reason was. If you're saying go to Oakleaf Sports Association and I say can we share the facilities, can we work out some kind of agreement where they come out on Mondays and Wednesday and we get it on Tuesdays and Thursdays just for this small portion over here, because you guys already have the whole football field and baseball field, softball field and everything else, we just want a little space for our people practicing that are a lot of Oakleaf residents and if they say no, can I come back here?
Mr. Soriano responded you can always come back here. It doesn't guarantee that we're still going to take space away from them. We have a lot of other problems on the side with sports associations arguing over property. Look at our parking lot right now. This isn't even really busy. We generally rent this room out for a wedding and when I have extra sports and events  going on, we have tennis, we have swim meets that have up to 800 people, then I have people that rent this room out for a few thousand dollars complaining that they don't even have a spot to park. This area out here is used for our residents. We try to limit the control of other organizations using it and we have given it to them for usage and they have to share it and kind of designate times because they can't use it 24/7. There's a lot of things that have gone into  us giving them the okay, so like I said, if you can work with them, they've done it before and given space to other groups. As far as what reasons you guys might not be able to work with them really  well,  I don't know because we're kind of staying out of that, but as far as us just taking space away from them, we're not going to do that.
Mr. Egger stated unless they say no when we try to work out channels, I can bring it to a vote then?

Mr. Soriano stated you can bring it back, but like I said it doesn't guarantee that we're going to change that. They've done a good job with what we've done with that. They've offered to host sports and they've served the community, so I don't see a reason to just take space away.

Supervisor's Requests
Mr. Swartz stated I wanted to bring up the parking issue. Have we looked into that space over by the ballfields? Is there anywhere we can make things better for the guests when they do come here?
Mr. Soriano responded we could look at that. We just did an approval on the other side
this last year and it's been hard enough to get the asphalt done but if you've been over there, but if you've been over there you saw we did the track with the same company we are using to get the expansion done but you're talking about 28 spaces. It's not a lot and it's $60,000 worth of work. To do some real good, you'd have to take away that whole big space.
Mr. Swartz asked up by the street there?
Mr. Soriano responded between the parking lot and the back fence of that softball field, that whole green space. You might get 50-60 spaces out of so we could look at the amount of money but like I said, to get the 28 it was $50,000-$60,000 at your sister district. We'd be taking away land to use whether it's for dog uses or sports uses, whatever, but it does add on to the parking. You've seen it during swim meets alone.
Mr. Swartz stated swim meets, weddings and we rent this out like you said for a significant amount and people should expect to be able to park.
Mr. Soriano stated if you want, I can look at proposals and  see ifwe can get pricing for it. It does help for weddings.
Mr. Morris stated I say yes, look at it.
Mr. Reynolds stated there are more neighborhoods opening up here and there are going to be more people that want to use these facilities.
Mr. Hartigan stated I think Rocky is right. We need to go ahead and start looking at the expansion.
Mr. Soriano stated I will get some sizes on pricing and I'll stick to that field on the side
going up toward the Preserve building.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Next Scheduled Meeting
Mr. Perry stated our next meeting is going to be April 12, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. at this location.

On MOTION by Mr. Morris seconded by Mr. Swartz with all in favor the meeting was adjourned.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

Pets accompanied by a resident of the Dis trict are all owed only in select ive areas of District properties. Pets are not allowed in any of the following areas in and around the Middle Village Am enity Center at anytime with the exception , f'set'l'ice animals:
Within the fenced areas definin g or enclosin g the Tennis courts
Within the fenced areas defini ng or enclosing the District Pools
Within the fe nce d areas defining or enclosing the Basketball courts
Within the fenced areas defining or enclosin g the Baseball field s
On any of the Soccer fie lds lo cated nea r the Baseball fields
On the Grand Lawn ·which is defi ned by th e hedges behind the Ame nity Center Buildin g
Within any District bui ldin gs or structures
No pets are allowed within any of the Children playground areas through out the District
District residents wi th pels on District Property are required to be in compliance with Section 4- 22 of Clay County Ani 11al Control Ordi nance that requires pets to be le as hed and that owners must remove any feces depo sited by the dog imm edi ately (see sub section (a) and sub section
(f) of Sectio n 4-22 of Clay County Animal Control Ordinance). Pet owners failin g to compl y with the Clay County Ordinance arc subject to loss of access to District property and amenities.

Pets accompanied by District residents and in compliance wit h Sec tion 4-22 of Clay County Ordinance are allowed on and alon g walkways th rougho ut the District with the except ion of those areas identified above as no pets areas.

2.	There will be no pets (exeept service animals), bicyc les, skate boards, roller blades, scooters, golf carts or other motorized recreational vehicle riding allowed on any Dis trict owned property, other than those areas specifically designated for such. This includes, but is not limited to, parking lots, Amenity Center sidewalks etc.. .

Re-number remaining policies in this section or simply move current policy #2 (smoking) to be new #8

,;;,f,i,.,c/	/;;e 	VSEPJL
/	/J,Df°/sJ

Policy considerations:

Dogs on property

l:lfei !ioHli"kei/Ji¢i fl *ef¢kfs :tJ;lef1A!libiuirJlsJ1,'k1flit/¢ 11iRi1JiliIJ'ffe lis,tiiill 11tf1lliti   1¥f1i:1>tet$Jigf,1iefii11 ;§f;l!ttli¢tr:niJf/JJ:it¢li      t efeii'i 1#1lfil, 'tii ttillil6Yifill§JifJ!li§'ffgJilfyt 1ittllfJi/fiV:illltlJ:'tiiitrtj[iJtifl :f.iJtt1,tliii [liJ:!iRSi¥1le tJqfiil9;1iJli/u'i!'lii cff§n iuflh1Y£7itilt1'aefiJ.1!i  filYttliiiiJl;/1it[ltilltf€!nit?llffiibiiilflt}fJttii iiif	¢frfit i iti itlil§21   t i l
Dogs are allowed at the Amenity center property on the grass, walking track areas, sidewalks, and parking lots areas only. Dogs are not allowed in the buildings, building walkways, or "fenced in" areas of any of the sport courts.

Dog park rules:

User are required to follow any and all rules posted at areas permitted to have dogs Park hours - Dawn until Dusk
Use at own risk, owners take liability and responsibility for their dogs at all times

Dogs must be on leash when entering and exiting the park. Age of handlers? Suggested 16 yrs of age and older
Age to utilize park? Suggested at 8 yrs of age and older- no child under that age should be inside of the dog park areas.
All user between the ages of 9 yrs and 15 yrs of age must be accompanied by an adult. Number of dogs/ number of dogs per? Suggested at 3 dogs per person
Clean up dog waste immediately

No digging - owners must repair holes dug by the dogs

No aggressive dogs - dogs must be removed immediately of they become aggressive

Dogs must be current on all vaccinations; owners if asked may be required to show proof of vaccinations No Sick Dogs
Dogs must wear a collar with a tag

Puppies must be at least 4 months of age? No food drinks or dog treats allowed
Private obedience training and any other commercial activities are not permitted unless prior written approval has been
given by on-site management
clirllir iiµnliit•ihf a'gf,·1lkmi  ri t•ZtlJtiilfliliwR'it1i1l lilii «6riilf4iifir!1l1;ffJ1flilflk{t,i	t i:1  8f:;fiJgJJt l[i% f!f'i illiillii r'.'rli fnriqfr} iiirJ
leii:£t5: 61)/ear§:9fcgg¢;/Jr;ulli 1	.

'
Adult children in households

Permanent residents who are neither the homeowners nor lease holders of the prol?_erty must provide n.roof of residenc iJi

i!J.lheform of a government issued photo ID with a district address listed, a utility bill with a district address listed along government Issued l?_hoto ID or a Power of Attorney.for the home with a district address listed along with government

 n order to obtain a district access (.JJJ .fJQ!ult children age18 and older must rovide a valid government issued photo ID with a district address.

Adult children may be co idered as part of the district household for purposes of" Amenity privileges" from the ages of 19yrs of age thru,JA(rs of age if they meet all other residency requirements previously stated in these policies. Adult children must present valid state identification each year showing the district address. Owners/Lease holders of the district address must sign an affidavit attesting to the adult children and/or the grandchildren' s residency at the district address. This affidavit will need to be updated each year with presentation of state identification. Adult children will be required to purchase their own ID cards regardless of number of cards issued to the household. Any children of the adult children (Grandchildren) must have their own cards from the age of 3yrs and older. Grandchildren may not be listed on the grandparent's cards.

-	-	-	-

/	updating cards for parents

t		eA,'/4cMR</ /;:,u,,(v_'r/<-104

 	

While children, under the age of 18, are not required to have their own card, it is highly recommended. To utilize the, facilities at ages 13 and above certainfacilities will require that thechildren have their own cards (please see eacH
Jacilit y_'s rules below) Children under the age of 13 do not need cards; wovided they_ are accom anied by their parent orl they_ gain access via guest J?.Olicy_ wocedures. All Children regardless of age will be ex ected to have their own district id cards if they are utilizing anyf acilit without a parent presenb
To allow parents to bring children from their household without a card the household must have properly updated cards. Parent's cards must list the number of children in the household that do not have cards that are above two yrs. of age. Parents must also update their cards to show correct number of children if a child is given their owncard.
sf;z,'J i	011/
The District is not required to grant access (amenity privileges) to a caregiver for a member of a district household. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the district may make exceptions to a number of policies on a case by case basis to accommodate the specific needs of a resident. Request must be made in writing to the on-site district management. All cases will be reviewed and granted or denied by the on-site district management.

/	Drones on district property

Drones may not be flown on district property without first obtaining written permission from on-site management .
j	Rate increases:
Possible increase of district access for non-district addresses. Currently $1800 annually, suggested $2200. Room increases?

--••i .....

Pets accompanied by a resident of the bistrict are allowed only in selective areas of District properties. Pets are not allowed in any of the following areas in and around the Middle Village Amenity Center at anytime with the exception of service animals:
- Within the fenced areas defining or enclosing the Tennis courts
Within the fenced areas defining or enclosing the District Pools
Within the fenced areas defining or enclosing the Basketball courts
Within the•fenced areas defining or enclosing the Baseball fields
On any of the Soccer fields located near the Baseball fields
On the Grand Lawn which is defined by the hedges behind the Amenity Center Building
Within any District buildings or structures

This pet exclusion applies District wide:
Within any of the Children playground areas through out the District

District members with pets on District Property are required to be in compliance with Section 4-22 of Clay County Animal Control Ordinance that requires pets to be leashed and that owners must remove any feces deposited
by the dog immediately (see sub section (a) and sub section (f)). Pet owners failing to comply with the Clay Cou ty Ordinance are subject to loss of access to District property and amenities.

Pets accompanied by District residents and in compliance with Section 4-22 of Clay County Ordinance are allowed on and along walkways throughout the DistricJ with the exception of those areas identified above as no pets areas.